What hell is the life of politics. Look around that cabinet table: every minister is facing exceptionally challenging portfolios lacking the resources to do what they understand is needed.
The legacy they received was more catastrophic than anticipated: they were handed explosive situations, misleading obstacles and enormous voids. Brexit is proving to be even more economically crippling than foreseen, resulting in the loss of the exchequer £80bn each year.
They are blighted by unfortunate circumstances: the Trump destroyer coincided with their watch. What more unfortunate incident than a prison officer setting free a rejected refugee sexual predator? Migrant crossings feel incessant.
A poorly timed leadership contest currently was bound to give the Prime Minister a setback. The 11% vote share at the Welsh assembly by-election might not even be their nadir.
They expect criticism, but they're only human. As often, Wes Streeting dares say what all can see: that we're experiencing "deep disillusionment in this country at the moment" and "a growing sense of despair about whether anyone is capable of turning this country round".
However, despite this, the current vitriolic state of voter perception is confusing and concerning. The Labour leader is the least popular prime minister on record. Truly?
He represents a respectable, earnest individual of good intentions, devoid of unwarranted superiority or ego. Contrast this with Boris Johnson, the short-lived PM, or the casual assumption of David Cameron, each achieving minimal to explain their overconfidence.
However, voters claim, the Labour leader is more ineffective. As the nation's leader, he's short on leadership appeal, they say: more significantly, he is missing governing flexibility, creative thinking or instinct for changing opinions.
The government mishandled regarding reductions to elderly citizens and those with disabilities, unbalanced by generosity elsewhere. Uncertain which voters to appeal to, ministers have permitted beneficial programs unpromoted, from working rights to sustainable development, new towns and training opportunities for the next generation.
An excessive number of key consultants persist in thinking the Daily Mail-inflected right requires courting, when almost twice as many voters have leaned liberal since the election was won. Survey specialist John Curtice advises the party to abandon courting Reform voters: they've gone.
Labour's leader is underperforming; there's no denying it when research shows no individual might ever return from such unprecedented lows.
But in unprecedented territory of such extreme volatility, conventional wisdom could prove irrelevant. Starmer pulled Labour from a post-Jeremy Corbyn state of despair that political analysts claimed couldn't be fixed in a single parliament.
Would anyone else achieve superior results, or has society entered an almost impossible to govern, never-content citizenry? Any government may be dismissed equally quickly after taking office, despite overwhelming support, except if it comes in a gilded chariot bearing untold bounty for stricken public services and financially strained households.
Predictably, concern within the parliamentary party will make discussion about replacing the leader rife if the upcoming votes go as poorly as forecast – or, various commentators argue, before that.
Officials face a contradiction: The party's sole opportunity lies in despair. Accept they might be defeated regardless, so utilize their significant numbers for four more years to follow their natural progressive principles: implement substantial tax changes, increasing government income.
Prepare for opposition the next election, so do everything now. Ignore survey results and voter research; let voters see sincerity in their purpose. The only way to regain public trust is to do transparently what they consider most just and equitable.
Rachel Reeves appropriately labels Reform "the single greatest threat" to our way of life. As the opposition virtually merge with Reform, a political alliance of certain type looms.
The government's responsibility is to take all necessary measures to prevent it. Anticipate alliances, remain palatable for like-minded parties when the name of the party is overshadowed by the deep red line against a governance risk unknown in our lifetime.
This represents a mission to overcome hopelessness.
Lena is a tech enthusiast and home entertainment expert who enjoys helping customers optimize their viewing experiences with the latest gadgets.